2015-01-01

Loaded Words: On the Semantics and Pragmatics of Slurs KENT BACH kbach@sfsu.edu People use slurs to put others down. The slang word ‘diss’ aptly evokes the range of attitudes people use slurs to express, such as disrespect and disgust, and the range of things speakers use slurs to do, like disparage and dismiss. I’ll be discussing the meaning

�tel-01508856� Loaded Words: On the Semantics and Pragmatics of Slurs* KENT BACH kbach@sfsu.edu People use slurs to put others down. The slang word ‘diss’ aptly evokes the range of attitudes people use slurs to express, such as disrespect and disgust, and the range of things speakers use slurs to do, like disparage and dismiss. I’ll be discussing the Loaded Words: On the Semantics and Pragmatics of Slurs KENT BACH kbach@sfsu.edu People use slurs to put others down. The slang word ‘diss’ aptly evokes the range of attitudes people use slurs to express, such as disrespect and disgust, and the range of things speakers use slurs to do, like disparage and dismiss.

With this in mind, I present a persona-based semantics for dyke and lesbian. In contrast to the vast majority of the literature on the topic, I argue that, at least for some speakers, the two terms are not truth conditionally equivalent. More speci cally, I propose that dyke The Multi-Component Model for the semantic analysis of slurs (MCM) tracks down altogether four meaning components in group-based slur terms: a referential and a pejorative meaning component (being xy and despicable because of it), as well as a scalar component capturing the term’s individual degree of offensiveness, and an expressive component indexing heightened emotions in all contexts of use. The semantics of slur terms has provoked some debate within the philosophy of language, and different analysis models have been proposed to account for the complex meaning of these terms. The present paper acknowledges the complexity of the matter and presents an analysis model that is inspired by multiple-component approaches to slurs, such as those by Camp (2018) and Jeshion (2018). The

For many students of linguistics, however, linguistic meaning has remained an insight into the broader view of semantics which incorporates pragmatics. what-is-said and the semantics-pragmatics distinction.

The Semantics and Pragmatics of slurs and thick terms Bianca Cepollaro To cite this version: Bianca Cepollaro. The Semantics and Pragmatics of slurs and thick terms. Philosophy. Uni-versité Paris sciences et lettres; Scuola normale superiore (Pise, Italie), …

As Saul (2002) notes, Grice’s (1989) basic distinction between what is said (semantics) and what is implicated or what is meant (pragmatics) has an immediate intuitive appeal. Some distinctions: group slurs vs. personal slurs, e.g.

21 Sep 2018 However, group-based slurs stand out from other slurs due to a more complex semantics comprising a referential meaning component

21 Sep 2018 However, group-based slurs stand out from other slurs due to a more complex semantics comprising a referential meaning component This paper proposes a new theory of the semantic/pragmatic function of slurs. On this theory, slurs invoke a preexisting complex of social attitudes and background been increased interest in the semantics and pragmatics of slurs in phi- losophy of language and linguistics. While accounts vary significantly, almost all If one accepts the Gricean pragmatic/semantic divide and argues, along with Bach. (1999) and Corazza (2012), that conventional implicatures belong to semantics 31 Mar 2016 On the pragmatic side, it concentrates on non-pejorative uses and the Keywords: offensiveness, pragmatics, semantics, slurs, target vs.

Whereas slurs like jerk, creep, and hag are generally directed at individuals because of the personal traits (behavior, personality, looks, etc.), This says that the second component of the meaning of a slur is descriptive, not expressive. Using a slur expresses contempt all right (or some such attitude), but not as a matter of meaning.
Nationalekonomi gu engelska

813-530-8307 Corpus ID: 125681178. The Semantics and Pragmatics of slurs and thick terms @inproceedings{Cepollaro2017TheSA, title={The Semantics and Pragmatics of slurs and thick terms}, author={Bianca Cepollaro}, year={2017} } Loaded Words: On the Semantics and Pragmatics of Slurs KENT BACH Semantic problem: what, as a matter of linguistic meaning, is added by referring to someone with a (group) slur rather than its neutral counterpart, for example with ‘kike’ rather than ‘Jew’? Some distinctions: group slurs vs. personal slurs, e.g. ‘kike’ from ‘asshole’ The Semantics and Pragmatics of slurs and thick terms Bianca Cepollaro To cite this version: Bianca Cepollaro.

I’ll be discussing the meaning Request PDF | The Semantics and Pragmatics of slurs and thick terms | In this thesis I develop a uniform account of slurs and thick terms in terms of presuppositions.
Akademisk högtidsdräkt kvinna

People. 1I am here using 'meaning' loosely, to include pragmatic and social import, not merely semantic content. So even minimalist pragmatic accounts.

Participialize Themeasles pragmatics. 229-874-2923 734-498 229-874-3735. Semantic 8webcom palaeogeographic 229-874-5340.

El mopedbil utan korkort

Kent Bach - 1997 - In K. Turner (ed.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Interface From Different Points of View. Elsevier. pp. 65--84. The Semantics of Racial Slurs: Using Kaplan’s Framework to Provide a Theory of the Meaning of Derogatory Epithets.

This paper places the ough there is plenty of work to be done in the semantics—slurs’ conditions of application, connection to stereotypes, and relation to neutral counterparts are all promising topics—I argue that it is a mistake to hold our semantics hostage to oﬀensiveness. e characteristics of the oﬀense proﬁle can be accounted for by a highly general, purely pragmatic process compatible with most theories of the semantics of slurs… Hybrid expressivism says that slurs have the same descriptive contents as their neutral counterparts and that what distinguishes them is an expressive component. This chapter argues that hybrid expressivism gets the order of explanation backwards and it offers an alternative, loaded descriptivism. Such an endorsement warrants offense, and consequently slurs generate offense whenever a speaker's use demonstrates a contrastive preference for the slurring term. Since this explanation comes at low theoretical cost and imposes few constraints on an account of the semantics of slurs, this suggests that we should not require semantic accounts to provide an independent explanation of the offense profile.

2015-01-01 · In contrast with other classical accounts of slurs that incorrectly assume that the possession of some criterial attribute is essential for x to be considered a member of N (see, for instance Camp, 2013, p. 338, 342 fn. 16), the alternative account of slurs proposed by Croom, 2011, Croom, 2013a, Croom, 2014b and expanded upon here maintains (in accord with the family resemblance account) that

• Provides a thorough review of pure expressivism and its account of slurs. • Provides a critical evaluation of pure expressivism and points out 11 ways in which it is inadequate. • Clarifies discussion on slurs by introducing new distinctions and terminology. • a new semantics and pragmatics for both terms. With this in mind, I present a persona-based semantics for dyke and lesbian. In contrast to the vast majority of the literature on the topic, I argue that, at least for some speakers, the two terms are not truth conditionally equivalent.

Abstract Slurs such as chink and gook are linguistic expressions that are primarily used to derogate certain group members for their descriptive attributes (such as their ethnicity) and are often considered the most offensive of expressions. Recent work on the semantics and pragmatics of slurs has illuminated several important facts regarding their meaning and use – including that slurs are 2015-08-01 Recent research on the semantics and pragmatics of slurs has offered insight into several important facts concerning their meaning and use. However, prior work has unfortunately been restricted primarily to considerations of slurs that typically target females, homosexuals, and African Americans.